What might be a consequence for an officer who refuses to cooperate in an administrative investigation after being warned?

When an officer refuses to cooperate in an administrative investigation after being warned, the likely consequence is disciplinary action. This can stem from the duty of officers to adhere to protocols and cooperate with investigations, as it is fundamentally tied to accountability and transparency within law enforcement agencies.

Discipline serves as a means to uphold the integrity of the police department and ensure compliance with required behavioral standards. Non-cooperation can undermine an investigation and erode trust within the agency, as well as damage public confidence in law enforcement. Therefore, disciplinary measures can range from reprimands to more severe penalties, depending on the specifics of the situation and the department's policies.

Promotion or non-discipline would imply positive outcomes, which are not aligned with a refusal to comply in an investigation context. Criminal charges could potentially apply in certain circumstances, but they are generally reserved for actions that violate laws rather than administrative protocol violations. Consequently, the most appropriate and probable consequence remains discipline, reinforcing the expectation that officers will fulfill their responsibilities concerning agency oversight.