What is required for a restriction of free exercise to be justified?

A restriction of free exercise is justified when there is a compelling government interest. This principle stems from the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which protects individuals' rights to practice their religion freely. However, this right is not absolute and can be limited when there is a significant governmental purpose that outweighs the individual's right to free exercise.

For example, laws that protect public safety, health, or morals may impose certain restrictions on religious practices if they serve a compelling interest and are narrowly tailored to achieve that interest. This requirement ensures that the government does not overreach in restricting religious freedoms without a substantial, legitimate reason, thus maintaining a balance between individual rights and the needs of society.

The other options do not provide the necessary legal framework for justifying a restriction on free exercise. Major public approval and general consensus of society may reflect public opinion but do not serve as a legal standard. The presence of any legal complaint also does not inherently justify a restriction; there must be a compelling reason related to government interests to warrant limitation on free exercise rights.