According to Tinker v Des Moines School, schools can limit speech that...

In Tinker v. Des Moines School District, the Supreme Court established that students do not lose their First Amendment rights to freedom of speech when they enter school. However, the Court also recognized that schools have the authority to limit speech that substantially disrupts the operations of the educational environment.

The rationale behind this ruling is that maintaining an effective learning atmosphere is critical, and when student speech poses a real threat to that environment—such as inciting chaos, preventing education, or creating a hostile atmosphere—schools have the responsibility to intervene. This principle ensures that while students can express themselves, their speech cannot interfere with the educational process or the rights of other students.

Options that suggest limiting speech based on promoting political agendas, criticizing government policies, or being considered unpopular do not align with the principles established in Tinker, which emphasizes the protection of speech unless it directly disrupts the school’s ability to function effectively. Hence, the focus is on maintaining order and ensuring a conducive learning environment, which is why the correct answer centers on disruption of school operations.